Product Comparison: Srixon Q-Star vs Srixon Z-Star
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time. More info
- Best golf ball on the market for intermediate players (15-20 hdcp). Beginners (30+ hdcp) should play with any ball under $20 a box (box = 12 balls, a sleeve = 3 balls).
- Over-compression means less distance. I've tried Bridgestone e5 and e6, but I have consistently scored lower with the Q-Star.
- They seem to fly pretty straight, so far only 4 of them haven't had the proper aerodynamics to fly straight and land in the middle of the fairway.
- Best overall distance ball I have ever played. 18 Hcp
- Q-Stars don't have the feel of a premium ball off the club face in my opinion, but they do spin pretty nicely with the low irons and I chip/putt well with them too.
- They have a soft feel similar to the pro v1, which I like very much
- Srixon has a softer feel off the driver and around the green than the Titleist Pro V.
- Urethane cover, compression, at a price that will not kill me if I lose one or two? For a weekend golfer, this is an easy decision.
- I’m a 8.7 HDCP and prefer a softer ball that has spin around the greens. This fits the bill.
- The ball has a lower compression core and the advantage to the player is the fact that it has an even “softer feel on all shots and improved launch conditions for more distance off the tee."
- These are soft enough to get good feedback on putts(i think putting feedback is better with these than pro v1s, but I use a solid brass putter which probably has a lot to do with it.
- They also gave a nice roll on the fair ways. Overall, I would recommend these to any golfer. A great design and ball.
- These balls are soft around the green yet LONG off the tee - If you have a FAST swing speed, these may not be the best off the tee for you..
- Great price and good quality for the price. Would purchase again. Works well with the shots I play. I don't shape shots too much cause I'm not good at it.
- These were getting scuffed fairly bad every 3 holes or so... loved the feel, distance... everything about them. But I'm not willing to pay for 5 balls per round...
- Screen grabbing is excellent. I can chip it low flight , and medium flight and they will spin very nicely in the 30-100 yard range, very similar results to the pro v1.
- I tested their balance making them float in salted water and the 3 I checked were perfectly balanced which means I don't have to worry about erratic behavior when putting.
- Best golf balls made. Spins as good as Pro V1x's, (maybe better). Z-Star's are better in windy conditions, they carry further against the wind and don't drift as much in cross wind.
- I also like the dimple pattern, for some reason visually the ball looks "bigger" than the titlest, I think is the effect of the bright white color and the dimple pattern.
- The ball definitely has a great feel to it and lasted longer than similar quality balls that were more expensive.